The Lone Star Review - State

SCJC Issues 13 Public Sanctions in 2023 to Texas Judges

The Hawk’s Eye – Consulting & News, your source for engaging and informative Texas news. Our publication focuses on delivering accurate and impactful stories that matter to you, with a primary emphasis on South Texas, including Hays, Bexar, Nueces, Webb, Cameron, and Hidalgo counties. Stay informed about pressing issues and gain a deeper understanding of your government. With a commitment to transparency and accountability, trust us to provide reliable information that holds those in power accountable.


The State Commission on Judicial Conduct in Texas has issued a series of disciplinary actions against judges and justices of the peace based on various violations of ethical and professional conduct. The actions include public reprimands, public admonishments, and public warnings, targeting individuals who failed to fulfill judicial education requirements, engaged in inappropriate conduct, interfered with legal processes, or endorsed political candidates.


SCJC Issues 13 Public Sanctions in 2023 to Texas Judges

SCJC Issues 13 Public Sanctions in 2023 to Texas Judges

The State Commission on Judicial Conduct (SCJC) in Texas has taken disciplinary actions against judges and justices of the peace for various violations of ethical and professional conduct. These actions include reprimands, admonishments, and warnings targeting individuals who failed to fulfill judicial education requirements, engaged in inappropriate conduct, interfered with legal processes, or endorsed political candidates. The individuals reprimanded included judges for failing to complete mandatory judicial education, endorsing political candidates, and engaging in inappropriate behavior towards employees. The disciplinary actions were taken to uphold high standards for the judiciary and promote public confidence in the legal system.

SCJC Reprimands Houston County Justice of the Peace for Failing to Complete Judicial Education.

The State Commission on Judicial Conduct has publicly reprimanded the Honorable Clyde Black, Justice of the Peace for Precinct 1 in Crockett, Houston County, Texas on March 2, 2023. During the commission’s meeting on February 1-3, 2023, it reviewed allegations against Judge Black and concluded with specific findings and conclusions.

The commission found that Judge Black did not fulfill the mandatory 20 hours of judicial education for the 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 Academic Years, as required for a justice of the peace. In addition, he had sought and obtained a waiver for the educational requirements for the 2020-2021 Academic Year with the condition that he would complete the 19 hours of education he had missed, in addition to the mandatory judicial education for the 2021-2022 Academic Year.

Despite his assertions, Judge Black failed to provide proof of completing the required courses, leading to a clear violation of Canon 2A and 3B(2) of the Texas Code of Judicial Conduct and Article V, Section 1-a(6)A of the Texas Constitution. The commission determined that Judge Black’s actions constituted willful failures to comply with the law and maintain professional competence, casting public discredit upon the judiciary and the administration of justice.

SCJC Reprimands Hidalgo County Justice of the Peace for Failing to Complete Judicial Education

During its meeting on April 5-6, 2023, the State Commission on Judicial Conduct concluded a review of the allegations against the Honorable Homer Jasso, Justice of the Peace, Pct. 4, Pl. 2, Edinburg, Hidalgo County, Texas. Judge Jasso was advised by letter of the Commission’s concerns and did not provide a written response. After considering the evidence before it, the Commission publicly reprimanded Jasso on June 8, 2023, and entered the following findings and conclusions:

The Honorable Homer Jasso was a Justice of the Peace, Pct. 4, Pl. 2 in Edinburg, Hidalgo County, Texas. Judge Jasso was required to take 20 hours of judicial education every Academic Year as a justice of the peace. Judge Jasso did not complete his 20 hours of judicial education for the 2020-2021 Academic Year. Judge Jasso did not complete his 20 hours of judicial education for the 2021-2022 Academic Year. Judge Jasso did seek and was granted an extension to make up his educational requirements for the 2020-2021 Academic Year while taking his educational requirements for the 2021-2022 Academic Year. Judge Jasso did not make up his educational requirement for the 2020-2021 Academic Year nor did he take his educational requirements for the 2021-2022 Academic Year.

On November 15, 2022, the State Commission on Judicial Conduct sent a Letter of Inquiry to Judge Jasso at the mailing address of his court. He was given until November 30, 2022 to respond. Judge Jasso did not respond. On January 23, 2023, the State Commission on Judicial Conduct sent another Letter of Inquiry to Judge Jasso’s home address after discovering he did not run for re-election in 2022. He was given until February 6, 2023 to respond. Judge Jasso did not respond.

The Commission has took the action pursuant to the authority conferred it in Article V, Sec. 1-a(8) of the Texas Constitution in a continuing effort to protect the public and promote public confidence in the judicial system.

During a meeting held on April 5-6, 2023, the State Commission on Judicial Conduct reviewed the allegations against the Honorable Tomas Ramirez III, who serves as the Justice of the Peace for Precinct 4 in Devine, Medina County, Texas. This review culminated in a public admonishment issued by the Commission on June 21, 2023, following a hearing where Judge Ramirez provided testimony regarding the matter.

The Commission’s findings indicated that Judge Ramirez, in his capacity as a Justice of the Peace, maintained a website promoting his private legal services. Furthermore, the website prominently featured his judicial position and included a photograph of Judge Ramirez donning his judicial robe. Notably, the website facilitated the payment of citations related to cases in his court, among other functions.

In response to inquiries from the Commission, Judge Ramirez characterized the inclusion of information about his judicial role on the website as purely “informational,” intended to update the public about his activities. Additionally, he testified before the Commission that this content was aimed at reducing the volume of phone calls pertaining to cases within his court. Judge Ramirez acknowledged, during his testimony, the potential impact of featuring a “Justice of the Peace” section on a website advertising his legal practice on his professional endeavors.

The Texas Code of Judicial Conduct’s Canon 2B explicitly prohibits judges from leveraging the prestige of their judicial office to advance their personal interests. In light of these findings, the State Commission on Judicial Conduct has determined that Judge Tomas Ramirez III should receive a public admonishment and be required to pursue additional education. This sanction is attributed to the use of a website to advertise both his private legal services and his judicial position, thereby violating Canon 2B. As a result, Judge Ramirez was mandated to complete two additional hours of continuing legal education, specifically focused on avoiding conduct related to leveraging the prestige of his judicial office, in addition to his mandatory judicial education for Fiscal Year 2023.

Furthermore, pursuant to the authority vested in the Commission by Section 33.036 of the Texas Government Code, specific information concerning this matter will be disclosed to the Texas Justice Court Training Center to facilitate the assignment of a suitable mentor for Judge Ramirez. The Commission expects Judge Ramirez to fulfill the additional two hours of mentor instruction within 60 days from the date of receiving written notification regarding the mentor assignment. It is the responsibility of Judge Ramirez to initiate contact with the assigned mentor and arrange the supplementary education accordingly.

This disciplinary action undertaken by the State Commission on Judicial Conduct is in alignment with its ongoing commitment to safeguard the public and uphold confidence in the judicial system, as mandated by Article V, Section 1-a(8) of the Texas Constitution.

SCJC Reprimands Former Shelby County Justice of the Peace for Breach of Professional Conduct

The State Commission on Judicial Conduct has publicly reprimanded the former Honorable Joshua Ritter, who previously served as Justice of the Peace for Precinct No. 4 in Tenaha, Shelby County, Texas on August 2, 2023. This decision followed a thorough review of allegations against Judge Ritter during the Commission’s meeting on June 7-8, 2023.

The Findings and Conclusion issued by the Commission highlighted significant breaches of professional conduct by Judge Ritter. It was found that on November 28, 2022, Judge Ritter engaged in a conversation with a defendant, Myers, without his attorney present or obtaining permission from Myers’ attorney to do so. This action was deemed a failure to comply with the law and maintain professional competence, consequently violating Canons 2A and 3B(2) of the Texas Code of Judicial Conduct.

Furthermore, Judge Ritter was found to have failed to adhere to reporting requirements outlined in Texas Local Government Code §§ 113.022 and 114.044. Testimony during a Show Cause Hearing revealed shortcomings in meeting the mandated reporting deadlines and the submission of incomplete and/or incorrect reports.

In light of these findings, the State Commission on Judicial Conduct concluded that Judge Ritter’s conduct was willful and/or persistent, casting public discredit on the judiciary and the administration of justice, as outlined in Article V, Section 1-a(6)A of the Texas Constitution.

As a result of these violations, the Commission has publicly reprimanded former Justice of the Peace Joshua Ritter, aiming to uphold high standards for the judiciary and promote public confidence in the legal system, in accordance with its mandate under Article V, Section 1-a(8) of the Texas Constitution. This disciplinary action serves as a testament to the Commission’s commitment to safeguarding the integrity of the judiciary and fostering public trust in the administration of justice.

The State Commission on Judicial Conduct recently concluded a review of the actions of Honorable Mike Bennett, County Judge for Goliad County, Texas, and subsequently issued a public reprimand on August 16, 2023, in response to his conduct.

The Commission’s findings indicated that on May 25, 2021, a warrant for the seizure of mistreated and emaciated cattle was issued by Goliad County Justice of the Peace Susan Moore. Subsequently, on May 26, 2021, during the process of executing the warrant at the 4300 Block of Franke Road in Goliad County, Judge Bennett arrived at the scene and attempted to interfere with the workers who were carrying out the seizure.

In his testimony before the Commission, Judge Bennett acknowledged his presence at the property and his efforts to halt the seizure, citing concerns related to the cattle’s ownership and an upcoming probate hearing scheduled in his court. Despite denying the order to stop the seizure, he admitted to requesting the workers to suspend their actions until he could ascertain additional information. Furthermore, he made attempts to intervene at a second property, demonstrating his involvement in the matter.

The Commission found Judge Bennett’s actions to be in violation of Canon 2B and Canon 4A(1) of the Texas Code of Judicial Conduct, which specifically prohibit judges from leveraging the prestige of their office for personal interests and from engaging in extra-judicial activities that could raise doubts about their impartiality. Additionally, the Commission concluded that Judge Bennett’s conduct cast public discredit upon the judiciary and the administration of justice, thereby violating Article V, Section 1-a(6)A of the Texas Constitution.

Consequently, the Texas State Commission on Judicial Conduct publicly reprimanded Honorable Mike Bennett, County Judge for Goliad County, Texas. This disciplinary action is in accordance with the Commission’s ongoing commitment to maintain public confidence in the judicial system and to protect the integrity of the judiciary, as outlined in Article V, Section 1-a(8) of the Texas Constitution.

SCJC Issues Public Warning to a District Court Judge in Upshur County Over Arrest

During its meeting on August 2, 2023, the State Commission on Judicial Conduct conducted a comprehensive review of the conduct of Honorable Jerald Dean Fowler, I, the judge presiding over the 115th Judicial District Court in Gilmer, Upshur County, Texas. This examination culminated in the issuance of a public warning on August 16, 2023, by the Commission, designated as CJC No. 23-0079.

The inquiry centered on an incident that transpired on September 9, 2022, when Judge Fowler was involved in a car accident and subsequently arrested for Driving While Intoxicated (DWI). Subsequently, on February 7, 2023, Judge Fowler entered a guilty plea to a Class B Misdemeanor DWI charge and received one year of deferred adjudication probation. In response to the Commission’s inquiries, Judge Fowler admitted to consuming a significant amount of alcohol and two different prescription sleep medications before operating his vehicle on the night in question. Shockingly, he conceded to having no recollection of the accident and only vague recollections of the events that followed.

Furthermore, Judge Fowler confirmed that his insurance company settled for $200,000 with the parties injured in the car accident. Despite the public attention garnered by his arrest and guilty plea, Judge Fowler assured the Commission that his consumption of alcohol and/or prescription drugs has never affected, and will never affect, his performance of judicial duties. He also asserted that he has taken proactive measures to ensure that such conduct will not be repeated in the future.

The Commission, guided by Canon 2A of the Texas Code of Judicial Conduct and Article V, Section 1-a(6)A of the Texas Constitution, which stipulates standards of conduct for judges, found that Judge Fowler’s actions on September 9, 2022, demonstrated a failure to comply with the law, as outlined in Section 49.04(a) of the Texas Penal Code. This determination was further compounded by the conclusion that Judge Fowler’s conduct constituted willful behavior that cast public discredit upon the judiciary and the administration of justice, in violation of the aforementioned constitutional provision.

In light of these findings, the Texas State Commission on Judicial Conduct has exercised its authority as mandated by Article V, Section 1-a(8) of the Texas Constitution, by issuing a public warning to Judge Jerald Dean Fowler, I. This disciplinary action reflects the Commission’s unwavering commitment to safeguarding the public interest and fostering confidence in the judicial system.

The issuance of this public warning serves as a testament to the Commission’s dedication to upholding the integrity of the judiciary and underscores its pivotal role in maintaining public trust in the administration of justice.

SCJC Admonishes Former Bexar County Justice of the Peace for Several Infractions

The former Honorable Robert Tejeda, who served as Justice of the Peace for Precinct 1, Place 1 in San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas, has been publicly admonished on October 4, 2023, by the State Commission on Judicial Conduct following a thorough review of his conduct during his tenure.

The investigation revealed several infractions, including the employment of his wife as the lead clerk of his court, which was deemed to constitute leveraging the prestige of his judicial office for the private interests of himself and his wife. Additionally, Judge Tejeda issued and posted a standing administrative order rejecting the validity of a court manager’s hiring and barring her from entering the courthouse, contrary to the standards of patience, dignity, and courtesy outlined in the Texas Code of Judicial Conduct.

Moreover, Judge Tejeda’s failure to cooperate with the Commission’s inquiry into these matters was found to be willful and persistent conduct that is clearly inconsistent with the proper performance of his duties and casts public discredit upon the judiciary and the administration of justice, in violation of the Texas Constitution.

The public admonishment is a result of these violations, aiming to uphold high standards for the judiciary, promote public confidence in the legal system, and protect the public interest. The Commission has taken this action in accordance with its mandate to safeguard the integrity of the judiciary and foster public trust in the administration of justice.

This disciplinary action reaffirms the Commission’s unwavering commitment to maintaining public confidence in the judicial system and upholding the highest ethical standards for judges.

SCJC Reprimands Medina County Justice of the Peace for Inappropriate Conduct

The State Commission on Judicial Conduct has concluded its review of the allegations against Honorable Clyde Howse, Justice of the Peace for Precinct 3 in Hondo, Medina County, Texas, and issued a public reprimand on October 12, 2023, following a thorough examination of the events.

The findings by the Commission revealed instances of inappropriate behavior by Judge Howse towards several female employees, including Andrea Pope, Chief Deputy Clerk for Justice of the Peace, Precinct 1. Judge Howse’s actions included making unwelcome advances and engaging in conduct that disrupted the work environment.

The incident in question occurred on May 18, 2023, when Judge Howse sent Ms. Pope a text containing inappropriate content, causing her significant distress and discomfort. Furthermore, an investigation by the County Human Resource Manager revealed similar instances of misconduct towards other female employees.

Judge Howse’s conduct was found to be in violation of the Texas Code of Judicial Conduct, particularly with regard to patience, dignity, and courtesy towards individuals in his official capacity. Additionally, his actions were deemed to demonstrate bias and prejudice, as well as a pattern of sexual harassment, which are clear violations of judicial standards and constitutional provisions.

In response to this reprimand, Judge Howse has been mandated to undergo five hours of mentorship and education focused on sexual harassment and proper courtesy in his official capacity, in addition to his required annual judicial education for Fiscal Year 2024. The Commission has also authorized the disclosure of relevant information to the Texas Justice Court Training Center to facilitate the assignment of an appropriate mentor for Judge Howse.

SCJC Admonishes Harrison County Justice of the Peace for Endorsing Political Candidate

During its meeting on October 4, 2023, the State Commission on Judicial Conduct concluded a review of the allegations against the Honorable Clarice Watkins, Justice of the Peace, Precinct 2, in Marshall, Harrison County, Texas and issued a public admonishment on October 27, 2023.

Judge Watkins, who served as the Justice of the Peace, Precinct 2, had announced her retirement and decision not to seek another term in office in 2021. However, on October 2, 2021, while still in office, she publicly endorsed Demisha Crawford, a clerk in her office, as her successor for the next Democratic primary election for her Court. This endorsement was publicized in an article by the local newspaper, the Marshall News Messenger, and shared on Judge Watkins’ personal Facebook page.

Further, Judge Watkins appeared with Crawford during an MLK parade in January 2022, riding on a float and wearing a Crawford Campaign T-Shirt, thus visibly endorsing her candidacy.

In response to the Commission’s concerns, Judge Watkins acknowledged the events but expressed unawareness of the violation, stating, “At the time I was unaware that I could not endorse [Crawford] because no one expressed to me that it would be an issue.”

The Commission found Judge Watkins in violation of Canon 5(2) of the Texas Code of Judicial Conduct, which prohibits judges from authorizing the public use of their name endorsing a candidate for public office. As a result, the Texas State Commission on Judicial Conduct publicly admonished Judge Watkins for this violation.

This disciplinary action, undertaken in line with the authority conferred by the Texas Constitution, reflects the Commission’s commitment to upholding high standards for the judiciary and promoting public confidence in the legal system. The Commission continues its efforts to ensure adherence to judicial ethics and preserve the integrity of the judiciary.

SCJC Admonishes Poteet Municipal Court Judge for Failing to Complete Judicial Education

During its meeting on October 4, 2023, the State Commission on Judicial Conduct addressed the case of Honorable Bill Gamez, a judge of the Poteet Municipal Court in Poteet, Atascosa County, Texas. The Commission concluded its review of the allegations against Judge Gamez, which were specifically related to his failure to comply with judicial education requirements and cooperate with the Commission’s investigation. He was issued a public admonishment on October 27, 2023.

The findings and conclusions provided by the Commission revealed that Judge Bill Gamez did not complete the required 16 hours of judicial education for the 2021-2022 Academic Year, as mandated by the Rules of Judicial Education. Despite the Commission’s attempts to engage with Judge Gamez regarding these concerns, including sending multiple Letters of Inquiry, Judge Gamez failed to respond and cooperate with the Commission’s investigation.

As per the Texas Code of Judicial Conduct, judges are expected to comply with the law and act in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary. Additionally, maintaining professional competence in the law is a fundamental requirement outlined in the Texas Code of Judicial Conduct.

Based on the record before it, the State Commission on Judicial Conduct determined that Judge Bill Gamez’s actions constituted willful or persistent conduct that is inconsistent with the proper performance of his duties and cast public discredit upon the judiciary or the administration of justice. This finding led to the issuance of a public admonishment for Judge Gamez, as a consequence of his failure to comply with judicial education requirements and cooperate with the Commission’s investigation.

The Commission’s decision to issue a public admonishment is aligned with its authority under Article V, Section 1-a(8) of the Texas Constitution, serving as a step in their continuous effort to protect the public and enhance public confidence in the judicial system. This disciplinary action underscores the Commission’s commitment to upholding high standards for the judiciary and promoting public trust in the legal system.

SCJC Admonishes Natalia Municipal Court for Failure to Complete Judicial Education

During its meeting on October 4, 2023, the State Commission on Judicial Conduct concluded a review of the allegations against the Honorable Jason Cruz, Judge of the Natalia Municipal Court in Natalia, Medina County, Texas. The Commission’s findings revealed that Judge Cruz failed to comply with the law and maintain professional competence in the law by not completing his required 16 hours of judicial education for the 2021-2022 Academic Year. He was publicly admonished on December 6, 2023.

The investigation also noted that Judge Cruz did not seek a waiver for his educational requirements for the 2021-2022 Academic Year. Despite multiple attempts by the State Commission on Judicial Conduct to engage with Judge Cruz regarding these concerns, including sending letters of inquiry and making phone calls, Judge Cruz did not provide a written response or cooperate with the Commission’s investigation.

Canon 2A and 3B(2) of the Texas Code of Judicial Conduct explicitly require judges to comply with the law, maintain professional competence, and act in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary. Moreover, Section 33.001(b)(5) of the Texas Government Code specifies that a judge’s failure to cooperate with the Commission constitutes “willful or persistent conduct” that is inconsistent with the proper performance of judicial duties, thus violating Article V, Section 1-a(6)A of the Texas Constitution.

In light of these violations, the Texas State Commission on Judicial Conduct publicly admonished Judge Jason Cruz for his willful or persistent conduct that cast public discredit upon the judiciary and the administration of justice, in alignment with the authority conferred it in Article V, Section 1-a(8) of the Texas Constitution. This disciplinary action serves as part of the Commission’s ongoing commitment to protect the public and enhance public confidence in the judicial system.

SCJC Reprimands Progreso Municipal Court Judge for Failure to Cooperate with Judicial Conduct Investigation

In a recent development, the State Commission on Judicial Conduct has issued a public reprimand against Honorable Orlando Jimenez, the Judge of the Progreso Municipal Court in Progreso, Hidalgo County, Texas on December 20, 2023. This disciplinary action follows Judge Jimenez’s failure to cooperate with the Commission’s investigation, resulting in findings that signify willful or persistent conduct inconsistent with the proper performance of his judicial duties and casting public discredit upon the judiciary or the administration of justice.

The sequence of events leading to this public reprimand commenced with a complaint filed by Bianca Villareal against Judge Jimenez concerning a hold on her driver’s license related to a traffic citation from 2009. Subsequently, the State Commission on Judicial Conduct initiated an inquiry into this matter, sending a Letter of Inquiry to Judge Jimenez on June 27, 2023. Despite multiple attempts by the Commission to elicit a response from Judge Jimenez, including granting an extension of time, he failed to provide the required cooperation.

Furthermore, despite being alerted of the inquiry and being given ample opportunities to respond, Judge Jimenez did not engage with the correspondence from the Commission. This lack of cooperation culminated in a formal recommendation for a tentative sanction, which also did not elicit a response from Judge Jimenez. Subsequent attempts to contact him and facilitate his participation in the investigation were met with minimal cooperation, ultimately leading to an informal appearance before the Commission on December 6, 2023.

During the appearance, Judge Jimenez testified that he was not aware of the initial Letter of Inquiry and claimed that his subordinate, Mr. Garcia, independently initiated the email requesting an extension to respond to the Commission. However, the Commission found this testimony to be disingenuous, leading to the determination that Judge Jimenez’s conduct constituted willful or persistent behavior that is inconsistent with the proper performance of his judicial duties and casts public discredit upon the judiciary and the administration of justice.

As a result, the Texas State Commission on Judicial Conduct has publicly reprimanded Judge Orlando Jimenez for his failure to cooperate with the Commission’s investigation, in violation of the Texas Government Code and the Texas Constitution. This disciplinary action aligns with the Commission’s commitment to safeguarding public interest and promoting confidence in the judicial system, as mandated by the Texas Constitution.

SCJC Admonishes Harris County Justice of the Peace for Advertising Wedding Services

The State Commission on Judicial Conduct has issued a public admonishment against the Honorable Israel B. Garcia, Jr., Justice of the Peace for Precinct 5, Place 1 in Houston, Harris County, Texas on December 20, 2023. This disciplinary action stems from Judge Garcia’s advertisement of his wedding services using the regalia of his office, including images of himself in his judicial robes sitting on the bench beneath the State seal, in violation of Canon 2B of the Texas Code of Judicial Conduct.

During its meeting on December 5-6, 2023, the State Commission on Judicial Conduct concluded a thorough review of the allegations against Judge Garcia. The Commission found that Judge Garcia advertised his performance of weddings, attempting to solicit paying customers for the same. His advertisement cards featured a picture of the judge in his judicial robes, along with his judicial title and an image of the Texas flag. Furthermore, he ran advertisements in Spanish-language newspapers, displaying a photograph of himself on the bench in his robes beneath the Harris County Seal, with the words “Bodas en Español” at the top and contact information at the bottom.

During his appearance before the Commission, Judge Garcia provided inconsistent and conflicting testimony regarding his efforts to advertise his wedding services. The Commission found his testimony overall to be contradictory and disingenuous, leading to the determination that he had lent the prestige of his judicial office to advance his private interests.

As a result of this violation, the Texas State Commission on Judicial Conduct publicly admonished Justice of the Peace Israel B. Garcia, Jr., and ordered him to obtain three (3) hours of instruction with a mentor, in addition to his required annual judicial education for Fiscal Year 2024. The Commission has also authorized the disclosure of relevant information to the Texas Justice Court Training Center to enable the assignment of the appropriate mentor for Judge Garcia. He is required to complete the additional three (3) hours of instruction within 60 days from the date of receiving written notification of the mentor assignment.

Disclaimer

The content provided in this publication is for educational and informational purposes only. The Hawk’s Eye – Consulting & News strives to deliver accurate and impactful stories. However, readers are advised to seek professional legal counsel and guidance for their specific legal inquiries and concerns. The publication does not assume any responsibility for actions taken by individuals based on the information presented.

Additionally, while every effort is made to ensure the reliability of the information, the publication does not warrant the completeness, accuracy, or timeliness of the content. Readers are encouraged to verify any legal information with official sources and to use their discretion when interpreting and applying the information provided.


A Couple of Our Other Reads

You may be interested in our publishing on two State Board of Pharmacy officers resigning to avoid termination.

Or you may find our publishing about a TABC officer resigning to avoid termination, of interest.


Follow Us on Social Media

If you are interested in staying updated on matters about your government in Texas and other important stories, trust The Hawk’s Eye – Consulting & News to provide reliable information that matters to you. You can follow us on social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, X, Reddit, YouTube, Tumblr, and LinkedIn to stay connected and informed.

FACEBOOK: TheHawksEyeNews
INSTAGRAM: Hawk_s_Eye_C_and_N
X: TheHawksEyeNews
REDDIT: TheHawksEyeCN
YOUTUBE: The Hawk’s Eye – Consulting & News
TUMBLR: The Hawk’s Eye – Consulting & News
LINKEDIN: The Hawk’s Eye – Consulting & News


Table of Contents

Leave a Reply